Home / Sports / Chicago Bears vs Washington Commanders Match Player Stats

Chicago Bears vs Washington Commanders Match Player Stats

Chicago Bears vs Washington Commanders Match Player Stats

The Chicago Bears vs Washington Commanders Match Player Stats produced an exciting, closely contested matchup in the 2025 NFL season. In this article, we’ll take a detailed look at the player statistics from their recent meeting on October 13, 2025, which the Bears edged out with a 25–24 victory. We’ll break down the most important individual performances on offense, defense, and special teams, and summarize the impact each player had on the final result.

Game Summary and Context

In this NFC showdown at Northwest Stadium in Landover, Maryland, the Bears managed to secure a narrow one-point win over the Commanders. The game came down to the wire, with Chicago’s kicker Jake Moody drilling a 38‑yard field goal as time expired to clinch the victory. The Bears’ offense balanced its attack with both passing and rushing, while Washington showed resilience but struggled with turnovers late in the game.

Quarterbacks and Passing Stats

Chicago Bears

Caleb Williams (QB)

  • Completions/Attempts: 17/29
  • Passing Yards: 252
  • Touchdowns: 1
  • Interceptions: 0

Williams delivered an efficient performance, spreading the ball effectively and avoiding costly turnovers. His ability to make timely throws helped sustain key drives throughout the game.

Washington Commanders

Jayden Daniels (QB)

  • Completions/Attempts: 19/26
  • Passing Yards: 211
  • Touchdowns: 3
  • Interceptions: 1

Daniels had a strong overall showing, accounting for three passing touchdowns and moving the Commanders’ offense consistently. However, his lone interception proved costly in a tightly contested gam

Rushing Leaders

Chicago Bears

D’Andre Swift (RB)

  • Carries: 14
  • Rushing Yards: 108
  • Rushing Touchdowns: 0

Swift led the Bears’ ground attack with a powerful performance, gaining over 100 yards on the ground and providing a stable complement to the passing game.

Caleb Williams (QB)

  • Rushing Yards: 3
  • Rushing Touchdowns: 1

Williams added a rushing touchdown on a short-yardage play, contributing to the Bears’ overall offensive versatility.

Washington Commanders

Jacory Croskey-Merritt (RB)

  • Carries: 17
  • Rushing Yards: 61

Croskey-Merritt paced Washington’s ground game with solid yardage but was unable to break away for a big play.

Jayden Daniels (QB)

  • Rushing Yards: 52

Daniels added mobility to the Commanders’ attack, using his legs to extend drives and keep the chains moving.

Receiving Statistics

Chicago Bears

D’Andre Swift (RB)

  • Receptions: 2
  • Receiving Yards: 67
  • Receiving Touchdowns: 1

Swift’s 55‑yard catch demonstrated explosive playmaking ability and was a pivotal moment in the scoring rhythm for the Bears.

Luther Burden III (WR)

  • Receptions: 4
  • Receiving Yards: 51

Burden provided a reliable target in the passing game, helping sustain key offensive drives.

Washington Commanders

Zach Ertz (TE)

  • Receptions: 6
  • Receiving Yards: 43
  • Receiving Touchdowns: 1

Ertz led the Commanders in receiving, converting key plays into points.

Chris Moore (WR)

  • Receptions: 3
  • Receiving Yards: 46
  • Receiving Touchdowns: 1

Moore was also a contributor, adding scoring efficiency into Washington’s aerial attack.

Luke McCaffrey (WR)

  • Receptions:
  • Receiving Yards: 33
  • Receiving Touchdowns: 1

McCaffrey made the most of limited targets with a scoring reception that helped keep the game close.

Defensive Contributions

Chicago Bears

Jaquan Brisker (S)

  • Interceptions: 1
  • Return Yards: 32

Brisker’s interception was a key defensive play that shifted momentum in favor of the Bears.

Washington Commanders

While individual defensive stats for Washington are not as prominently tracked in this recap, the Commanders’ defense forced critical stops and pressured the Bears at times. Despite this resistance, turnovers and key defensive lapses allowed Chicago to seize the win.

Special Teams and Other Notable Stats

Chicago Bears

Jake Moody (Kicker)

  • Field Goals Made: 4/5
  • Longest Field Goal: 48 yards
  • Extra Points: 1/1

Moody was perfect under pressure, including a game‑winning kick as time expired.

Washington Commanders

Matt Gay (Kicker)

  • Field Goals Made: 1/2
  • Longest Field Goal: 53 yards
  • Extra Points: 3/3

Gay contributed to Washington’s scoring but didn’t have the same clutch success as Moody.

Team and Situational Stats

Here’s a quick look at how the teams compared in some team-level metrics from this matchup:

  • Time of Possession: Bears — 28:26 | Commanders — 31:34
  • Total Yards: Bears — 381 | Commanders — 329
  • Total Plays: Bears — 59 | Commanders — 60
  • Passing Yards: Bears — 236 | Commanders — 205
  • Rushing Yards: Bears — 145 | Commanders — 124
  • Turnovers: Bears — 0 | Commanders — 3

These numbers illustrate how Chicago maximized efficiency with fewer mistakes and capitalized when it mattered most.

Conclusion

The Bears’ victory over the Commanders was a product of balanced offensive execution, clutch kicking, and opportunistic defense. Caleb Williams demonstrated poise in the passing game, D’Andre Swift provided a dual-threat performance, and Chicago’s defense made a critical play when needed. For Washington, Jayden Daniels’ three touchdown passes kept the game competitive, with notable contributions from Zach Ertz and Chris Moore. However, turnovers and missed opportunities ultimately swung the result in Chicago’s favor.

FAQs

Q1: Who was the standout player for the Bears?
A1: D’Andre Swift stood out with over 100 rushing yards and a key receiving touchdown. Caleb Williams also contributed with efficient passing and a rushing TD.

Q2: How did the Commanders keep the game close?
A2: Jayden Daniels threw three touchdown passes, and players like Zach Ertz and Chris Moore made key scoring plays. Their defense forced some stops, but turnovers proved costly.

Q3: What was the deciding factor in the game?
A3: Turnovers and Chicago’s clutch kicking, particularly Jake Moody’s game-winning field goal, ultimately decided the close contest.

Q4: How did the rushing game influence the matchup?
A4: The Bears’ ground game, led by Swift, helped sustain drives and control the clock. Daniels’ mobility helped the Commanders, but it wasn’t enough to overcome mistakes.

Q5: Were there any notable defensive plays?
A5: Yes, Jaquan Brisker’s interception for the Bears was a key moment that shifted momentum in Chicago’s favor.

Tagged:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *